Metrics of OsteoChondral Allografts (MOCA) Group Consensus Statements on the Use of Viable Osteochondral Allograft
Purpose: To develop consensus among an expert group with extensive clinical and scientific experience in osteochondral allografts (OCAs), addressing controversies in treatment of cartilage and subchondral defects with OCA transplantation.
- The MOCA group participated in a 3-round modified Delphi process on topics that lead to debate and lack scientific evidence in the areas of surgical technique, graft matching, indications, and rehabilitation/return to sport.
- Group members were selected for their contributions to the science and clinical application of OCAs and consists of the most highly experienced surgeons.
- A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the level of agreement each statement had with established research.
- Topics such as the management of cysts and unstable grafts achieved unanimous agreement despite limited evidence in the literature.
- Further areas of study were proposed such as efficacy of pulse lavage, the use of biologic adjuncts and a standardized method for testing cellular viability.
- After final voting, 17 statements reached consensus.
- 11 received unanimous agreement (100%) and 6 received strong agreement (80-99%)
Take-Away: The 17 statements generated over three rounds of the Delphi process help provide guidance on surgical and perioperative management of lesions with OCA transplantation.
Click here to access the paper.
Authors: Simon Gortz, MD, Suzanne M. Tabbaa, PhD, Deryk G. Jones, MD, John D. Polousky, MD, Dennis C. Crawford, MD, PhD and the MOCA Committee
Published: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, March 2021.
Institution: Final round of voting took place at the Orthopaedic Learning Center in Rosemont, IL